Accuracy Formula:
From: | To: |
Accuracy is a statistical measure that evaluates how well a binary classification test correctly identifies or excludes a condition. It represents the proportion of true results (both true positives and true negatives) among the total number of cases examined.
The calculator uses the accuracy formula:
Where:
Explanation: The formula calculates the ratio of correct predictions to the total predictions made by a classification model or test.
Details: Accuracy is a fundamental metric in evaluating the performance of classification models in machine learning, medical testing, quality control, and various scientific fields. It provides a simple way to measure the overall correctness of a test or model.
Tips: Enter the number of true positives, true negatives, and total cases. All values must be non-negative integers, and the total must be greater than zero and at least equal to the sum of true positives and true negatives.
Q1: What is a good accuracy value?
A: Generally, higher accuracy is better, but the acceptable threshold depends on the specific application. In many fields, accuracy above 0.8 (80%) is considered good, but this varies by context.
Q2: Are there limitations to using accuracy alone?
A: Yes, accuracy can be misleading with imbalanced datasets. For example, if 95% of cases are negative, a model that always predicts negative would have 95% accuracy but be useless for identifying positive cases.
Q3: What other metrics complement accuracy?
A: Precision, recall, F1-score, and specificity are often used alongside accuracy to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of a classification model's performance.
Q4: Can accuracy be greater than 1?
A: No, accuracy is always between 0 and 1 (or 0% to 100% when expressed as a percentage), as it represents a proportion of correct predictions.
Q5: How does accuracy differ from precision?
A: Accuracy measures overall correctness, while precision specifically measures the proportion of true positives among all positive predictions (how many of the positive identifications were actually correct).